QMS 3 - PATH OF WORKFLOW

3.0-1 Introduction to QMS 3

Illuminating the Path to ISO 15189 (SLMTA 3) e-Learning Course Download Video
  • Overview

The Path of Workflow (PoW) is comprised of interrelated or interacting activities that transforms biological patient sample material into laboratory results and information to ultimately assure the most appropriate clinical outcome. QMS 3 focuses on this key process and how to manage the activities involved in service realization.

References

Astion, M. (2018, January 1). Patient Satisfaction Is Not the Same as Patient Safety. Q&A with Michael Astion, MD, PhD. Retrieved from : Clinical Laboratory News

Berte, L. (n.d.). Understanding Why “PROCESS” is the Essential Key for Lean and Other Quality Tools to Continually Improve Your Lab’s Efficiency, Cost Effectiveness, and Profitability. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from https://www.labqualityconfab.com/wp-content/uploads/Berte.TUE_.4pm_FINAL.pdf

Brooks, Z. (n.d.). Awesome Numbers. Retrieved from www.awesome numbers.org

Brooks, Z. C. (2001). Performance-driven Quality Control. Washington DC: AACC Press.

Brooks, Z. C. (2003). Basic Concepts. Worthington, Ontario, Canada: Zoe Brooks Quality Consulting.

Burnett, D. (2013). A Practical Guide to ISO 15189 in Laboratory Medicine. London: ACB Venture Publications.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). (2010). GP33-A: Accuracy in Patient and Sample Indentification; Approved Guidelines. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute .

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). (2017). GP41: Collection of Diagnostic Venous Blood Specimens (7 ed.). Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). (2017). GP48: Essential Elements of a Phlebotomy Training Program (1 ed.). Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). (2018). Management of Paper-based and Electronic Laboratory Information. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

Datema, T. A., Oskam, L., & Klatser, P. R. (2011, December 11). Review and comparison of quality standards, guidelines and regulations for laboratories. African Journal for Laboratory Medicine, 1(1), 7 pages. Retrieved from dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v1i1.3

Dawson, J. (2015, July-August). Navigating ISO 15189. Retrieved from MedicalLab Management: https://www.medlabmag.com/article/1201/?search=navigating%20ISO%2015189

Dawson, J. (2017, February 9). Do No Harm: Diagnostic Errors and the Lab. Retrieved from http://www.labtestingmatters.org/do-no-harm-diagnostic-errors-and-the-lab/

Dawson, J. (2017, August 29). Lean Six Sigma is Not Quality. Retrieved from G2 Intelligence: https://www.g2intelligence.com/lean-six-sigma-is-not-quality/

Epstein, H. M. (2019, January 8). Dx IQ Column #1—The most important medical issue ever: And why you need to know more about it. Retrieved from Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine: https://www.improvediagnosis.org/dxiq-column/most-important-medical-issue-ever/

Han, Y., Makarova, E., Ringel, M., & Telpis, V. (2019, January). Digitization, automation, and online testing: The future of pharma quality control. Retrieved from McKinsey and Company:    https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/digitization-a...

Health Research & Educational Trust. (2018, September). Improving Diagnosis in Medicine Change Package. Chicago, Illinois: Health Research & Educational Trust. Retrieved from  http://www.hret-hiin.org/

Homer, M. (2019, February 26). After death of St. Luke’s patient, review uncovers 122 issues with blood labels over four-month period. Retrieved from KHOU 11: https://www.khou.com/article/news/health/after-death-of-st-lukes-patient-review-uncovers-122-issues-...

International Organization for Standarization. (2015). Quality Management Principles. Geneva , Switzerland. Retrieved January 4, 2019, from https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/pub100080.pdf

Laposata, M., & Rohde, R. E. (2019, April 18). Preventing diagnostic errors by uniting the clinical laboratory with direct patient care. Retrieved from Elsevier Connect: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/preventing-diagnostic-errors-by-uniting-the-clinical-laboratory-wit...

Lundberg, G. D. (2018, December 19). A Doctor's Rules for Other Doctors - Part 2. Retrieved from Medscape Internal Medicine: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/906529?nlid=126774_1025&src=WNL_mdplsfeat_181226_mscpedit_p...

Medical Lab Management. (2017, October). Specimen Labeling & Tracking in the Ambulatory Setting. Medical Lab Management, 6(8), pp. 2, 4-5.

Newitt, V. N. (2019, March). Labs add safety net to critical values procedure. Retrieved from CAP TODAY: https://captodayonline.com/labs-add-safety-net-to-critical-values-procedure/

Noble, M. (2018, January 2). Fit for Process versus Fit for Purpose. Retrieved from Making Medical Lab Quality Relevant: http://www.medicallaboratoryquality.com/2018/01/

Plebani, M. (2017). Quality in laboratory medicine: an unfinished journey. Journal of laboratory and Precison Medicine, 2(63).

Rhoads, D. G. (2012). Lab Statistics Fun and Easy (5th ed.). South Burlington, VT: Data Innovations, LLC.

Return on Investment. (n.d.). Retrieved from Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine: https://www.improvediagnosis.org/roadmap-for-research-to-improve-diagnosis-return-on-investment/

Saah, A., & Hoover , D. (1997, January 1). "Sensitivity" and "specificity" reconsidered: the meaning of these terms in analytical and diagnostic settings. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(1), 91-94. Retrieved March 6, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8992938

Sikaris, K. A. (2017). Enhancing the Clinical Value of medical Laboratory Testing. Clinical Biochemistry Reviews, 38(3), 107-114.

Smith, C. A. (n.d.). Promoting High Reliability on the Frontline. Retrieved from American Nurse Today: https://americannursetoday.mydigitalpublication.com/publication/index.php?i=476895&pjs=1&p=&...

Tony Badrick Gay, S., McCaughey, E. J., & Georgiou, A. (2017, February 15). External Quality Assessment beyond the analytical phase: an Australian perspective. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry, 27(1), 73-80.

Westgard, J. O. (2007). Basic QC Practices (2nd ed.). Madison: Westgard QC, Inc.

Westgard, J. O. (2010). Basic QC Practices (3rd ed.). Madison: Westgard QC, Inc.

Westgard, J. O. (2016). Basic QC Practices (4th ed.). Madison: Westgard QC, Inc.

World Health Organziation, Regional Office for Africa. (2015). Stepwise Labarotry Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) Cheklist (ver. 2:2015).

Instructor(s)

Elde Mel Paladar

Mr. Paladar led the redesign of the classroom-based SLMTA 3 curriculum for on-line delivery and will serve as an instructor and facilitator of the e-learning course. Based in Malawi, he is a Project Manager at Adventist Health International, as well as Assistant Professor at the Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Loma Linda University. Mr. Paladar has a Master of Science in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. He is a SLMTA master trainer and has trained numerous laboratorians in the past decade.


Supported Browsers: Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge or Mozilla Firefox